Compare MicroBT Whatsminer M70S vs IceRiver AE3
Detailed comparison between MicroBT Whatsminer M70S and IceRiver AE3. Compare hashrate, power consumption, profitability, and technical specifications.
Quick comparison: MicroBT Whatsminer M70S vs IceRiver AE3. Daily profits: $2.68 vs $23.96.
Miner Comparison Results
MicroBT Whatsminer M70S
SHA-256 • December 2025
IceRiver AE3
zkSNARK • November 2025
Profitability Comparison
Daily Profit
Monthly Profit
Yearly Profit
Technical Specifications
MicroBT Whatsminer M70S
IceRiver AE3
Profit Analysis
A detailed comparison of the daily, monthly, and yearly profitability between the two selected ASIC miners, highlighting which offers the better return on investment.
The IceRiver AE3 delivers superior daily profit of $23.96 versus $2.68 from the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S. With current electricity rates, the IceRiver AE3 provides better return on investment through more efficient power consumption relative to its mining output. The IceRiver AE3 consumes 3400W versus 3140W for the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S, resulting in $0.50 higher daily electricity expenses. This power difference becomes particularly important for large-scale mining operations where every watt counts toward overall facility efficiency and cooling requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know
Which miner is more profitable: MicroBT Whatsminer M70S or IceRiver AE3?
What is the hashrate of the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S?
What is the hashrate of the IceRiver AE3?
Which cryptocurrencies are best to mine with MicroBT Whatsminer M70S or IceRiver AE3?
What is the full-load power consumption of MicroBT Whatsminer M70S or IceRiver AE3?
How efficient is MicroBT Whatsminer M70S or IceRiver AE3 in terms of hashrate per watt?
How does electricity cost affect the profitability of MicroBT Whatsminer M70S or IceRiver AE3?
What is the estimated daily and monthly income from mining with MicroBT Whatsminer M70S or IceRiver AE3?
What are the operational noise levels of MicroBT Whatsminer M70S or IceRiver AE3?
What cooling solutions are recommended for MicroBT Whatsminer M70S or IceRiver AE3?
Hardware Comparison
A side-by-side breakdown of key hardware specifications to evaluate performance, efficiency, and overall value of the two selected ASIC miners.
Release timeline shows the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S launched in December 2025 while the IceRiver AE3 entered the market in November 2025. Newer miners typically incorporate improved chip architecture and manufacturing processes, leading to better efficiency and performance characteristics. Physical dimensions comparison reveals the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S measures 430 x 155 x 226mm while the IceRiver AE3 has dimensions of 370 x 195 x 290mm. Size considerations directly impact rack density, shipping costs, and facility space requirements for mining operations. Weight specifications show the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S at 13500g compared to 15000g for the IceRiver AE3. Heavier units often indicate more robust construction and heat dissipation components but may require stronger mounting solutions and increase shipping expenses. Acoustic performance differs with the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S operating at 75db versus 75db for the IceRiver AE3. Noise levels significantly impact placement options, with quieter units suitable for residential or office environments while louder miners require dedicated facilities with proper sound isolation. Humidity specifications indicate the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S operates within 5 - 95 % conditions compared to 10 - 90 % for the IceRiver AE3. Better humidity tolerance enables deployment in more diverse geographic locations and reduces the need for expensive climate control systems in mining facilities.
Why Choose Our ASIC Miner Comparison Platform
Get the most accurate, transparent, and data-driven insights to choose the best mining hardware for your goals.
Real-Time Market Data
Our system pulls live pricing and profitability metrics to keep comparisons accurate and relevant.
Transparent Performance Metrics
Compare hashrate, efficiency, and ROI side-by-side without hidden data or biased rankings.
Clean & Intuitive Interface
Our comparison dashboard is designed for clarity — quickly find what matters most without the clutter.
Expert-Backed Analysis
Each comparison is verified by experienced mining professionals to help you make the most profitable choice.
Built for Miners, by Miners
Our mission is to simplify ASIC miner research with real data, transparent comparisons, and professional insights — helping you save time, reduce risk, and maximize profitability.
Compare ASIC Miners
Discover why our platform is the most reliable and transparent way to compare ASIC miners for maximum profitability.
Choosing our ASIC miner comparison platform gives you a clear advantage in navigating the complex and fast-changing world of crypto mining. We provide the most accurate, data-driven insights sourced directly from manufacturers and real-time market conditions, ensuring you always have access to up-to-date profitability, efficiency, and cost metrics. Our comparison tools let you easily evaluate hashrate, power consumption, ROI, and break-even periods, helping you identify which miner best fits your budget and long-term goals. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or an experienced investor managing a large-scale operation, our transparent and easy-to-use platform helps you make smarter, faster, and more profitable decisions.
Key Insights
Quick highlights comparing the performance and features of the selected ASIC miners.
The IceRiver AE3 generates $21.28 more daily profit than the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S.
The IceRiver AE3 generates $21.78 more daily income than the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S.
The MicroBT Whatsminer M70S consumes 7.6% less power, making it more energy efficient.
These miners use different algorithms (Scrypt vs SHA-256), so they mine different cryptocurrencies.
Both miners use Air cooling systems.
Both the MicroBT Whatsminer M70S and IceRiver AE3 have identical noise levels of 75db.
The MicroBT Whatsminer M70S is 10.0% lighter than the other miner.
English
German
Hungarian
Dutch
Spanish
French
Italian
Czech
Polish
Greek