MinerCompare 2.3 is out · Advanced solo mining UI, speed improvements and more — update the app.
* Compare ASIC Miners *

Compare IceRiver AE3 vs Goldshell HS3

Detailed comparison between IceRiver AE3 and Goldshell HS3. Compare
Read more

Quick comparison: IceRiver AE3 vs Goldshell HS3. Daily profits: $-4.75 vs $-3.40.

Miner Comparison Results

Profit Analysis

A detailed comparison of the daily, monthly, and yearly profitability between the two selected ASIC miners, highlighting which offers the better return on investment.

The Goldshell HS3 delivers superior daily profit of $-3.40 versus $-4.75 from the IceRiver AE3. With current electricity rates, the Goldshell HS3 provides better return on investment through more efficient power consumption relative to its mining output. Power consumption analysis reveals the IceRiver AE3 requires 3400W compared to 2000W for the Goldshell HS3. This 1,400W difference translates to approximately $2.69 additional daily electricity costs, which significantly impacts long-term profitability especially during periods of lower mining rewards.

* Answers 10

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know

Based on current market conditions and electricity costs of $0.080 per kWh, the Goldshell HS3 delivers $-3.40 daily profit compared to $-4.75 for the IceRiver AE3. Profitability varies with market conditions and electricity rates.

The IceRiver AE3 has a hashrate of 2GH/s.

The Goldshell HS3 has a hashrate of 2TH/s.

The IceRiver AE3 uses zkSNARK, ideal for mining various coins, while the Goldshell HS3 uses HandShake, suitable for various coins.

The IceRiver AE3 consumes 3400W, while the Goldshell HS3 consumes 2000W.

Efficiency comparison is not possible as the IceRiver AE3 uses zkSNARK and the Goldshell HS3 uses HandShake, making hashrate per watt metrics incomparable.

Electricity costs significantly impact profitability. At $0.080 per kWh, the IceRiver AE3 incurs daily electricity costs of $6.53, while the Goldshell HS3 incurs $3.84. Higher electricity rates reduce profits, making power-efficient miners more cost-effective.

The IceRiver AE3 generates $1.78 daily and $53.40 monthly. The Goldshell HS3 generates $0.44 daily and $13.20 monthly, based on current market conditions.

The IceRiver AE3 operates at 75db, while the Goldshell HS3 operates at 75db. Lower noise levels are preferable for residential or noise-sensitive environments.

The IceRiver AE3 uses Air cooling, and the Goldshell HS3 uses Air cooling. Both require robust cooling systems like liquid cooling loops or high-capacity air cooling to maintain optimal performance and prevent overheating.

Hardware Comparison

A side-by-side breakdown of key hardware specifications to evaluate performance, efficiency, and overall value of the two selected ASIC miners.

Release timeline shows the IceRiver AE3 launched in November 2025 while the Goldshell HS3 entered the market in October 2020. Newer miners typically incorporate improved chip architecture and manufacturing processes, leading to better efficiency and performance characteristics. Physical dimensions comparison reveals the IceRiver AE3 measures 370 x 195 x 290mm while the Goldshell HS3 has dimensions of 310 x 180 x 280mm. Size considerations directly impact rack density, shipping costs, and facility space requirements for mining operations. Weight specifications show the IceRiver AE3 at 15000g compared to 7000g for the Goldshell HS3. Heavier units often indicate more robust construction and heat dissipation components but may require stronger mounting solutions and increase shipping expenses. Acoustic performance differs with the IceRiver AE3 operating at 75db versus 75db for the Goldshell HS3. Noise levels significantly impact placement options, with quieter units suitable for residential or office environments while louder miners require dedicated facilities with proper sound isolation. Humidity specifications indicate the IceRiver AE3 operates within 10 - 90 % conditions compared to 10 - 90 % for the Goldshell HS3. Better humidity tolerance enables deployment in more diverse geographic locations and reduces the need for expensive climate control systems in mining facilities.

Why Choose Our ASIC Miner Comparison Platform

Get the most accurate, transparent, and data-driven insights to choose the best mining hardware for your goals.

Real-Time Market Data

Our system pulls live pricing and profitability metrics to keep comparisons accurate and relevant.

Transparent Performance Metrics

Compare hashrate, efficiency, and ROI side-by-side without hidden data or biased rankings.

Clean & Intuitive Interface

Our comparison dashboard is designed for clarity — quickly find what matters most without the clutter.

Expert-Backed Analysis

Each comparison is verified by experienced mining professionals to help you make the most profitable choice.

Built for Miners, by Miners

Our mission is to simplify ASIC miner research with real data, transparent comparisons, and professional insights — helping you save time, reduce risk, and maximize profitability.

Compare ASIC Miners

Discover why our platform is the most reliable and transparent way to compare ASIC miners for maximum profitability.

Choosing our ASIC miner comparison platform gives you a clear advantage in navigating the complex and fast-changing world of crypto mining. We provide the most accurate, data-driven insights sourced directly from manufacturers and real-time market conditions, ensuring you always have access to up-to-date profitability, efficiency, and cost metrics. Our comparison tools let you easily evaluate hashrate, power consumption, ROI, and break-even periods, helping you identify which miner best fits your budget and long-term goals. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or an experienced investor managing a large-scale operation, our transparent and easy-to-use platform helps you make smarter, faster, and more profitable decisions.

Key Insights

Quick highlights comparing the performance and features of the selected ASIC miners.

1

The Goldshell HS3 generates $1.35 more daily profit than the IceRiver AE3.

2

The IceRiver AE3 generates $1.34 more daily income than the Goldshell HS3.

3

The Goldshell HS3 consumes 41.2% less power, making it more energy efficient.

4

These miners use different algorithms (Scrypt vs SHA-256), so they mine different cryptocurrencies.

5

Both miners use Air cooling systems.

6

Both the IceRiver AE3 and Goldshell HS3 have identical noise levels of 75db.

7

The Goldshell HS3 is 53.3% lighter than the other miner.

* MinerCompare mobile app *

Mining profitability in your pocket

Every ASIC miner, GPU and coin from the site, with live profit, ROI and your own electricity rate — free, no account needed, on iOS and Android.

500+ ASIC miners
75+ GPUs
Live difficulty & prices
Portfolio tracking
MinerCompare mobile app
BTC $83,784.86 ↗3.33%
ALPH $0.058360 ↘2.44%
KAS $0.040760 ↗0.41%
ETC $8.70 ↘0.31%
LTC $59.22 ↘1.51%
DOGE $0.091990 ↗2.39%
RXD $0.000038 ↘1.39%
BCH $262.04 ↗0.91%
CKB $0.001280 ↗2.26%
HNS $0.001867 ↘4.23%
KDA $0.004577 ↘1.96%
SC $0.000932 ↘1.16%
ALEO $0.038140 ↗1.02%
FB $0.340000 ↘1.68%
XMR $578.30 ↗0.53%
SCP $0.015140 ↘4.25%
BELLS $0.123800 ↘0.4%
XTM $0.002050 ↘0.21%
ZEC $1,522.61 ↘0.64%
BTC $83,784.86 ↗3.33%
ALPH $0.058360 ↘2.44%
KAS $0.040760 ↗0.41%
ETC $8.70 ↘0.31%
LTC $59.22 ↘1.51%
DOGE $0.091990 ↗2.39%
RXD $0.000038 ↘1.39%
BCH $262.04 ↗0.91%
CKB $0.001280 ↗2.26%
HNS $0.001867 ↘4.23%
KDA $0.004577 ↘1.96%
SC $0.000932 ↘1.16%
ALEO $0.038140 ↗1.02%
FB $0.340000 ↘1.68%
XMR $578.30 ↗0.53%
SCP $0.015140 ↘4.25%
BELLS $0.123800 ↘0.4%
XTM $0.002050 ↘0.21%
ZEC $1,522.61 ↘0.64%
BTC $83,784.86 ↗3.33%
ALPH $0.058360 ↘2.44%
KAS $0.040760 ↗0.41%
ETC $8.70 ↘0.31%
LTC $59.22 ↘1.51%
DOGE $0.091990 ↗2.39%
RXD $0.000038 ↘1.39%
BCH $262.04 ↗0.91%
CKB $0.001280 ↗2.26%
HNS $0.001867 ↘4.23%
KDA $0.004577 ↘1.96%
SC $0.000932 ↘1.16%
ALEO $0.038140 ↗1.02%
FB $0.340000 ↘1.68%
XMR $578.30 ↗0.53%
SCP $0.015140 ↘4.25%
BELLS $0.123800 ↘0.4%
XTM $0.002050 ↘0.21%
ZEC $1,522.61 ↘0.64%