Compare Proto Rig vs iBeLink BM-K3 Mini
Detailed comparison between Proto Rig and iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Compare hashrate, power consumption, profitability, and technical specifications.
Quick comparison: Proto Rig vs iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Daily profits: $11.49 vs $-0.42.
Miner Comparison Results
Proto Rig
SHA-256 • September 2025
iBeLink BM-K3 Mini
Kadena • August 2023
Profitability Comparison
Daily Profit
Monthly Profit
Yearly Profit
Technical Specifications
Proto Rig
iBeLink BM-K3 Mini
Profit Analysis
A detailed comparison of the daily, monthly, and yearly profitability between the two selected ASIC miners, highlighting which offers the better return on investment.
The Proto Rig generates higher daily profit of $11.49 compared to $-0.42 from the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. This superior profitability comes from its optimized power-to-hashrate ratio and current electricity costs at $0.080 per kWh. Power consumption analysis reveals the Proto Rig requires 12000W compared to 290W for the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. This 11,710W difference translates to approximately $22.48 additional daily electricity costs, which significantly impacts long-term profitability especially during periods of lower mining rewards.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know
Which miner is more profitable: Proto Rig or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What is the hashrate of the Proto Rig?
What is the hashrate of the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
Which cryptocurrencies are best to mine with Proto Rig or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What is the full-load power consumption of Proto Rig or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
How efficient is Proto Rig or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini in terms of hashrate per watt?
How does electricity cost affect the profitability of Proto Rig or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What is the estimated daily and monthly income from mining with Proto Rig or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What are the operational noise levels of Proto Rig or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What cooling solutions are recommended for Proto Rig or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
Hardware Comparison
A side-by-side breakdown of key hardware specifications to evaluate performance, efficiency, and overall value of the two selected ASIC miners.
Release timeline shows the Proto Rig launched in September 2025 while the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini entered the market in August 2023. Newer miners typically incorporate improved chip architecture and manufacturing processes, leading to better efficiency and performance characteristics. Physical dimensions comparison reveals the Proto Rig measures 390 x 290 x 500mm while the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini has dimensions of 170 x 88 x 178mm. Size considerations directly impact rack density, shipping costs, and facility space requirements for mining operations. Weight specifications show the Proto Rig at 50kg compared to 2100g for the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Heavier units often indicate more robust construction and heat dissipation components but may require stronger mounting solutions and increase shipping expenses. Acoustic performance differs with the Proto Rig operating at 80db versus 35db for the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Noise levels significantly impact placement options, with quieter units suitable for residential or office environments while louder miners require dedicated facilities with proper sound isolation. Humidity specifications indicate the Proto Rig operates within 10-90% conditions compared to 10 - 90 % for the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Better humidity tolerance enables deployment in more diverse geographic locations and reduces the need for expensive climate control systems in mining facilities.
Why Choose Our ASIC Miner Comparison Platform
Get the most accurate, transparent, and data-driven insights to choose the best mining hardware for your goals.
Real-Time Market Data
Our system pulls live pricing and profitability metrics to keep comparisons accurate and relevant.
Transparent Performance Metrics
Compare hashrate, efficiency, and ROI side-by-side without hidden data or biased rankings.
Clean & Intuitive Interface
Our comparison dashboard is designed for clarity — quickly find what matters most without the clutter.
Expert-Backed Analysis
Each comparison is verified by experienced mining professionals to help you make the most profitable choice.
Built for Miners, by Miners
Our mission is to simplify ASIC miner research with real data, transparent comparisons, and professional insights — helping you save time, reduce risk, and maximize profitability.
Compare ASIC Miners
Discover why our platform is the most reliable and transparent way to compare ASIC miners for maximum profitability.
Choosing our ASIC miner comparison platform gives you a clear advantage in navigating the complex and fast-changing world of crypto mining. We provide the most accurate, data-driven insights sourced directly from manufacturers and real-time market conditions, ensuring you always have access to up-to-date profitability, efficiency, and cost metrics. Our comparison tools let you easily evaluate hashrate, power consumption, ROI, and break-even periods, helping you identify which miner best fits your budget and long-term goals. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or an experienced investor managing a large-scale operation, our transparent and easy-to-use platform helps you make smarter, faster, and more profitable decisions.
Key Insights
Quick highlights comparing the performance and features of the selected ASIC miners.
The Proto Rig generates $11.91 more daily profit than the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini.
The Proto Rig generates $34.39 more daily income than the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini.
The iBeLink BM-K3 Mini consumes 97.6% less power, making it more energy efficient.
These miners use different algorithms (Scrypt vs SHA-256), so they mine different cryptocurrencies.
Both miners use Air cooling systems.
The iBeLink BM-K3 Mini is quieter, with a noise level of 35db.
The iBeLink BM-K3 Mini is 95.8% lighter than the other miner.
English
German
Hungarian
Dutch
Spanish
French
Italian
Czech
Polish
Greek