Compare IceRiver AE3 vs Canaan Avalon A1366I
Detailed comparison between IceRiver AE3 and Canaan Avalon A1366I. Compare hashrate, power consumption, profitability, and technical specifications.
Quick comparison: IceRiver AE3 vs Canaan Avalon A1366I. Daily profits: $28.67 vs $-1.53.
Miner Comparison Results
IceRiver AE3
zkSNARK • November 2025
Canaan Avalon A1366I
SHA-256 • May 2023
Profitability Comparison
Daily Profit
Monthly Profit
Yearly Profit
Technical Specifications
IceRiver AE3
Canaan Avalon A1366I
Profit Analysis
A detailed comparison of the daily, monthly, and yearly profitability between the two selected ASIC miners, highlighting which offers the better return on investment.
The IceRiver AE3 generates higher daily profit of $28.67 compared to $-1.53 from the Canaan Avalon A1366I. This superior profitability comes from its optimized power-to-hashrate ratio and current electricity costs at $0.080 per kWh. The Canaan Avalon A1366I consumes 3570W versus 3400W for the IceRiver AE3, resulting in $0.33 higher daily electricity expenses. This power difference becomes particularly important for large-scale mining operations where every watt counts toward overall facility efficiency and cooling requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know
Which miner is more profitable: IceRiver AE3 or Canaan Avalon A1366I?
What is the hashrate of the IceRiver AE3?
What is the hashrate of the Canaan Avalon A1366I?
Which cryptocurrencies are best to mine with IceRiver AE3 or Canaan Avalon A1366I?
What is the full-load power consumption of IceRiver AE3 or Canaan Avalon A1366I?
How efficient is IceRiver AE3 or Canaan Avalon A1366I in terms of hashrate per watt?
How does electricity cost affect the profitability of IceRiver AE3 or Canaan Avalon A1366I?
What is the estimated daily and monthly income from mining with IceRiver AE3 or Canaan Avalon A1366I?
What are the operational noise levels of IceRiver AE3 or Canaan Avalon A1366I?
What cooling solutions are recommended for IceRiver AE3 or Canaan Avalon A1366I?
Hardware Comparison
A side-by-side breakdown of key hardware specifications to evaluate performance, efficiency, and overall value of the two selected ASIC miners.
Release timeline shows the IceRiver AE3 launched in November 2025 while the Canaan Avalon A1366I entered the market in May 2023. Newer miners typically incorporate improved chip architecture and manufacturing processes, leading to better efficiency and performance characteristics. Physical dimensions comparison reveals the IceRiver AE3 measures 370 x 195 x 290mm while the Canaan Avalon A1366I has dimensions of 292 x 171 x 281mm. Size considerations directly impact rack density, shipping costs, and facility space requirements for mining operations. Weight specifications show the IceRiver AE3 at 15000g compared to 9700g for the Canaan Avalon A1366I. Heavier units often indicate more robust construction and heat dissipation components but may require stronger mounting solutions and increase shipping expenses. Acoustic performance differs with the IceRiver AE3 operating at 75db versus 35db for the Canaan Avalon A1366I. Noise levels significantly impact placement options, with quieter units suitable for residential or office environments while louder miners require dedicated facilities with proper sound isolation. Humidity specifications indicate the IceRiver AE3 operates within 10 - 90 % conditions compared to 10 - 90 % for the Canaan Avalon A1366I. Better humidity tolerance enables deployment in more diverse geographic locations and reduces the need for expensive climate control systems in mining facilities.
Why Choose Our ASIC Miner Comparison Platform
Get the most accurate, transparent, and data-driven insights to choose the best mining hardware for your goals.
Real-Time Market Data
Our system pulls live pricing and profitability metrics to keep comparisons accurate and relevant.
Transparent Performance Metrics
Compare hashrate, efficiency, and ROI side-by-side without hidden data or biased rankings.
Clean & Intuitive Interface
Our comparison dashboard is designed for clarity — quickly find what matters most without the clutter.
Expert-Backed Analysis
Each comparison is verified by experienced mining professionals to help you make the most profitable choice.
Built for Miners, by Miners
Our mission is to simplify ASIC miner research with real data, transparent comparisons, and professional insights — helping you save time, reduce risk, and maximize profitability.
Compare ASIC Miners
Discover why our platform is the most reliable and transparent way to compare ASIC miners for maximum profitability.
Choosing our ASIC miner comparison platform gives you a clear advantage in navigating the complex and fast-changing world of crypto mining. We provide the most accurate, data-driven insights sourced directly from manufacturers and real-time market conditions, ensuring you always have access to up-to-date profitability, efficiency, and cost metrics. Our comparison tools let you easily evaluate hashrate, power consumption, ROI, and break-even periods, helping you identify which miner best fits your budget and long-term goals. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or an experienced investor managing a large-scale operation, our transparent and easy-to-use platform helps you make smarter, faster, and more profitable decisions.
Key Insights
Quick highlights comparing the performance and features of the selected ASIC miners.
The IceRiver AE3 generates $30.20 more daily profit than the Canaan Avalon A1366I.
The IceRiver AE3 generates $29.87 more daily income than the Canaan Avalon A1366I.
The IceRiver AE3 consumes 4.8% less power, making it more energy efficient.
These miners use different algorithms (Scrypt vs SHA-256), so they mine different cryptocurrencies.
Both miners use Air cooling systems.
The Canaan Avalon A1366I is quieter, with a noise level of 35db.
The Canaan Avalon A1366I is 35.3% lighter than the other miner.
English
German
Hungarian
Dutch
Spanish
French
Italian
Czech
Polish
Greek