Compare Goldshell HS Lite vs Goldshell CK Box II
Detailed comparison between Goldshell HS Lite and Goldshell CK Box II. Compare hashrate, power consumption, profitability, and technical specifications.
Quick comparison: Goldshell HS Lite vs Goldshell CK Box II. Daily profits: $-2.07 vs $-0.59.
Miner Comparison Results
Goldshell HS Lite
HandShake • August 2022
Goldshell CK Box II
Eaglesong • October 2022
Profitability Comparison
Daily Profit
Monthly Profit
Yearly Profit
Technical Specifications
Goldshell HS Lite
Goldshell CK Box II
Profit Analysis
A detailed comparison of the daily, monthly, and yearly profitability between the two selected ASIC miners, highlighting which offers the better return on investment.
The Goldshell CK Box II delivers superior daily profit of $-0.59 versus $-2.07 from the Goldshell HS Lite. With current electricity rates, the Goldshell CK Box II provides better return on investment through more efficient power consumption relative to its mining output. Power consumption analysis reveals the Goldshell HS Lite requires 1250W compared to 400W for the Goldshell CK Box II. This 850W difference translates to approximately $1.63 additional daily electricity costs, which significantly impacts long-term profitability especially during periods of lower mining rewards.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know
Which miner is more profitable: Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell CK Box II?
What is the hashrate of the Goldshell HS Lite?
What is the hashrate of the Goldshell CK Box II?
Which cryptocurrencies are best to mine with Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell CK Box II?
What is the full-load power consumption of Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell CK Box II?
How efficient is Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell CK Box II in terms of hashrate per watt?
How does electricity cost affect the profitability of Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell CK Box II?
What is the estimated daily and monthly income from mining with Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell CK Box II?
What are the operational noise levels of Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell CK Box II?
What cooling solutions are recommended for Goldshell HS Lite or Goldshell CK Box II?
Hardware Comparison
A side-by-side breakdown of key hardware specifications to evaluate performance, efficiency, and overall value of the two selected ASIC miners.
Release timeline shows the Goldshell HS Lite launched in August 2022 while the Goldshell CK Box II entered the market in October 2022. Newer miners typically incorporate improved chip architecture and manufacturing processes, leading to better efficiency and performance characteristics. Physical dimensions comparison reveals the Goldshell HS Lite measures 264 x 200 x 290mm while the Goldshell CK Box II has dimensions of 198 x 150 x 96mm. Size considerations directly impact rack density, shipping costs, and facility space requirements for mining operations. Weight specifications show the Goldshell HS Lite at 8100g compared to 2200g for the Goldshell CK Box II. Heavier units often indicate more robust construction and heat dissipation components but may require stronger mounting solutions and increase shipping expenses. Acoustic performance differs with the Goldshell HS Lite operating at 55db versus 35db for the Goldshell CK Box II. Noise levels significantly impact placement options, with quieter units suitable for residential or office environments while louder miners require dedicated facilities with proper sound isolation. Humidity specifications indicate the Goldshell HS Lite operates within 10 - 90 % conditions compared to 10 - 90 % for the Goldshell CK Box II. Better humidity tolerance enables deployment in more diverse geographic locations and reduces the need for expensive climate control systems in mining facilities.
Why Choose Our ASIC Miner Comparison Platform
Get the most accurate, transparent, and data-driven insights to choose the best mining hardware for your goals.
Real-Time Market Data
Our system pulls live pricing and profitability metrics to keep comparisons accurate and relevant.
Transparent Performance Metrics
Compare hashrate, efficiency, and ROI side-by-side without hidden data or biased rankings.
Clean & Intuitive Interface
Our comparison dashboard is designed for clarity — quickly find what matters most without the clutter.
Expert-Backed Analysis
Each comparison is verified by experienced mining professionals to help you make the most profitable choice.
Built for Miners, by Miners
Our mission is to simplify ASIC miner research with real data, transparent comparisons, and professional insights — helping you save time, reduce risk, and maximize profitability.
Compare ASIC Miners
Discover why our platform is the most reliable and transparent way to compare ASIC miners for maximum profitability.
Choosing our ASIC miner comparison platform gives you a clear advantage in navigating the complex and fast-changing world of crypto mining. We provide the most accurate, data-driven insights sourced directly from manufacturers and real-time market conditions, ensuring you always have access to up-to-date profitability, efficiency, and cost metrics. Our comparison tools let you easily evaluate hashrate, power consumption, ROI, and break-even periods, helping you identify which miner best fits your budget and long-term goals. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or an experienced investor managing a large-scale operation, our transparent and easy-to-use platform helps you make smarter, faster, and more profitable decisions.
Key Insights
Quick highlights comparing the performance and features of the selected ASIC miners.
The Goldshell CK Box II generates $1.48 more daily profit than the Goldshell HS Lite.
The Goldshell HS Lite generates $0.15 more daily income than the Goldshell CK Box II.
The Goldshell CK Box II consumes 68.0% less power, making it more energy efficient.
These miners use different algorithms (Scrypt vs SHA-256), so they mine different cryptocurrencies.
Both miners use Air cooling systems.
The Goldshell CK Box II is quieter, with a noise level of 35db.
The Goldshell CK Box II is 72.8% lighter than the other miner.
English
German
Hungarian
Dutch
Spanish
French
Italian
Czech
Polish
Greek