Compare Goldshell HS Box II vs Goldshell DG Card
Detailed comparison between Goldshell HS Box II and Goldshell DG Card. Compare hashrate, power consumption, profitability, and technical specifications.
Quick comparison: Goldshell HS Box II vs Goldshell DG Card. Daily profits: $-0.66 vs $-0.07.
Miner Comparison Results
Goldshell HS Box II
HandShake • January 2024
Goldshell DG Card
Scrypt • March 2025
Profitability Comparison
Daily Profit
Monthly Profit
Yearly Profit
Technical Specifications
Goldshell HS Box II
Goldshell DG Card
Profit Analysis
A detailed comparison of the daily, monthly, and yearly profitability between the two selected ASIC miners, highlighting which offers the better return on investment.
The Goldshell DG Card delivers superior daily profit of $-0.07 versus $-0.66 from the Goldshell HS Box II. With current electricity rates, the Goldshell DG Card provides better return on investment through more efficient power consumption relative to its mining output. Power consumption analysis reveals the Goldshell HS Box II requires 400W compared to 65W for the Goldshell DG Card. This 335W difference translates to approximately $0.64 additional daily electricity costs, which significantly impacts long-term profitability especially during periods of lower mining rewards.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know
Which miner is more profitable: Goldshell HS Box II or Goldshell DG Card?
What is the hashrate of the Goldshell HS Box II?
What is the hashrate of the Goldshell DG Card?
Which cryptocurrencies are best to mine with Goldshell HS Box II or Goldshell DG Card?
What is the full-load power consumption of Goldshell HS Box II or Goldshell DG Card?
How efficient is Goldshell HS Box II or Goldshell DG Card in terms of hashrate per watt?
How does electricity cost affect the profitability of Goldshell HS Box II or Goldshell DG Card?
What is the estimated daily and monthly income from mining with Goldshell HS Box II or Goldshell DG Card?
What are the operational noise levels of Goldshell HS Box II or Goldshell DG Card?
What cooling solutions are recommended for Goldshell HS Box II or Goldshell DG Card?
Hardware Comparison
A side-by-side breakdown of key hardware specifications to evaluate performance, efficiency, and overall value of the two selected ASIC miners.
Release timeline shows the Goldshell HS Box II launched in January 2024 while the Goldshell DG Card entered the market in March 2025. Newer miners typically incorporate improved chip architecture and manufacturing processes, leading to better efficiency and performance characteristics. Physical dimensions comparison reveals the Goldshell HS Box II measures 178 x 150 x 84mm while the Goldshell DG Card has dimensions of 132 x 21 x 88mm. Size considerations directly impact rack density, shipping costs, and facility space requirements for mining operations. Weight specifications show the Goldshell HS Box II at 2000g compared to 325g for the Goldshell DG Card. Heavier units often indicate more robust construction and heat dissipation components but may require stronger mounting solutions and increase shipping expenses. Acoustic performance differs with the Goldshell HS Box II operating at 35db versus 35db for the Goldshell DG Card. Noise levels significantly impact placement options, with quieter units suitable for residential or office environments while louder miners require dedicated facilities with proper sound isolation. Humidity specifications indicate the Goldshell HS Box II operates within 10 - 90 % conditions compared to 10 - 90 % for the Goldshell DG Card. Better humidity tolerance enables deployment in more diverse geographic locations and reduces the need for expensive climate control systems in mining facilities.
Why Choose Our ASIC Miner Comparison Platform
Get the most accurate, transparent, and data-driven insights to choose the best mining hardware for your goals.
Real-Time Market Data
Our system pulls live pricing and profitability metrics to keep comparisons accurate and relevant.
Transparent Performance Metrics
Compare hashrate, efficiency, and ROI side-by-side without hidden data or biased rankings.
Clean & Intuitive Interface
Our comparison dashboard is designed for clarity — quickly find what matters most without the clutter.
Expert-Backed Analysis
Each comparison is verified by experienced mining professionals to help you make the most profitable choice.
Built for Miners, by Miners
Our mission is to simplify ASIC miner research with real data, transparent comparisons, and professional insights — helping you save time, reduce risk, and maximize profitability.
Compare ASIC Miners
Discover why our platform is the most reliable and transparent way to compare ASIC miners for maximum profitability.
Choosing our ASIC miner comparison platform gives you a clear advantage in navigating the complex and fast-changing world of crypto mining. We provide the most accurate, data-driven insights sourced directly from manufacturers and real-time market conditions, ensuring you always have access to up-to-date profitability, efficiency, and cost metrics. Our comparison tools let you easily evaluate hashrate, power consumption, ROI, and break-even periods, helping you identify which miner best fits your budget and long-term goals. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or an experienced investor managing a large-scale operation, our transparent and easy-to-use platform helps you make smarter, faster, and more profitable decisions.
Key Insights
Quick highlights comparing the performance and features of the selected ASIC miners.
The Goldshell DG Card generates $0.59 more daily profit than the Goldshell HS Box II.
The Goldshell HS Box II generates $0.05 more daily income than the Goldshell DG Card.
The Goldshell DG Card consumes 83.8% less power, making it more energy efficient.
These miners use different algorithms (Scrypt vs SHA-256), so they mine different cryptocurrencies.
Both miners use Air cooling systems.
Both the Goldshell HS Box II and Goldshell DG Card have identical noise levels of 35db.
The Goldshell DG Card is 83.8% lighter than the other miner.
English
German
Hungarian
Dutch
Spanish
French
Italian
Czech
Polish
Greek