Compare Goldshell HS Box vs iBeLink BM-K3 Mini
Detailed comparison between Goldshell HS Box and iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Compare hashrate, power consumption, profitability, and technical specifications.
Quick comparison: Goldshell HS Box vs iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Daily profits: $-0.38 vs $-0.44.
Miner Comparison Results
Goldshell HS Box
HandShake • May 2021
iBeLink BM-K3 Mini
Kadena • August 2023
Profitability Comparison
Daily Profit
Monthly Profit
Yearly Profit
Technical Specifications
Goldshell HS Box
iBeLink BM-K3 Mini
Profit Analysis
A detailed comparison of the daily, monthly, and yearly profitability between the two selected ASIC miners, highlighting which offers the better return on investment.
The Goldshell HS Box generates higher daily profit of $-0.38 compared to $-0.44 from the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. This superior profitability comes from its optimized power-to-hashrate ratio and current electricity costs at $0.080 per kWh. The iBeLink BM-K3 Mini consumes 290W versus 230W for the Goldshell HS Box, resulting in $0.12 higher daily electricity expenses. This power difference becomes particularly important for large-scale mining operations where every watt counts toward overall facility efficiency and cooling requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know
Which miner is more profitable: Goldshell HS Box or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What is the hashrate of the Goldshell HS Box?
What is the hashrate of the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
Which cryptocurrencies are best to mine with Goldshell HS Box or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What is the full-load power consumption of Goldshell HS Box or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
How efficient is Goldshell HS Box or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini in terms of hashrate per watt?
How does electricity cost affect the profitability of Goldshell HS Box or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What is the estimated daily and monthly income from mining with Goldshell HS Box or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What are the operational noise levels of Goldshell HS Box or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
What cooling solutions are recommended for Goldshell HS Box or iBeLink BM-K3 Mini?
Hardware Comparison
A side-by-side breakdown of key hardware specifications to evaluate performance, efficiency, and overall value of the two selected ASIC miners.
Release timeline shows the Goldshell HS Box launched in May 2021 while the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini entered the market in August 2023. Newer miners typically incorporate improved chip architecture and manufacturing processes, leading to better efficiency and performance characteristics. Physical dimensions comparison reveals the Goldshell HS Box measures 178 x 150 x 84mm while the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini has dimensions of 170 x 88 x 178mm. Size considerations directly impact rack density, shipping costs, and facility space requirements for mining operations. Weight specifications show the Goldshell HS Box at 2000g compared to 2100g for the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Heavier units often indicate more robust construction and heat dissipation components but may require stronger mounting solutions and increase shipping expenses. Acoustic performance differs with the Goldshell HS Box operating at 35db versus 35db for the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Noise levels significantly impact placement options, with quieter units suitable for residential or office environments while louder miners require dedicated facilities with proper sound isolation. Humidity specifications indicate the Goldshell HS Box operates within 10 - 90 % conditions compared to 10 - 90 % for the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini. Better humidity tolerance enables deployment in more diverse geographic locations and reduces the need for expensive climate control systems in mining facilities.
Why Choose Our ASIC Miner Comparison Platform
Get the most accurate, transparent, and data-driven insights to choose the best mining hardware for your goals.
Real-Time Market Data
Our system pulls live pricing and profitability metrics to keep comparisons accurate and relevant.
Transparent Performance Metrics
Compare hashrate, efficiency, and ROI side-by-side without hidden data or biased rankings.
Clean & Intuitive Interface
Our comparison dashboard is designed for clarity — quickly find what matters most without the clutter.
Expert-Backed Analysis
Each comparison is verified by experienced mining professionals to help you make the most profitable choice.
Built for Miners, by Miners
Our mission is to simplify ASIC miner research with real data, transparent comparisons, and professional insights — helping you save time, reduce risk, and maximize profitability.
Compare ASIC Miners
Discover why our platform is the most reliable and transparent way to compare ASIC miners for maximum profitability.
Choosing our ASIC miner comparison platform gives you a clear advantage in navigating the complex and fast-changing world of crypto mining. We provide the most accurate, data-driven insights sourced directly from manufacturers and real-time market conditions, ensuring you always have access to up-to-date profitability, efficiency, and cost metrics. Our comparison tools let you easily evaluate hashrate, power consumption, ROI, and break-even periods, helping you identify which miner best fits your budget and long-term goals. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or an experienced investor managing a large-scale operation, our transparent and easy-to-use platform helps you make smarter, faster, and more profitable decisions.
Key Insights
Quick highlights comparing the performance and features of the selected ASIC miners.
The Goldshell HS Box generates $0.05 more daily profit than the iBeLink BM-K3 Mini.
The iBeLink BM-K3 Mini generates $0.06 more daily income than the Goldshell HS Box.
The Goldshell HS Box consumes 20.7% less power, making it more energy efficient.
These miners use different algorithms (Scrypt vs SHA-256), so they mine different cryptocurrencies.
Both miners use Air cooling systems.
Both the Goldshell HS Box and iBeLink BM-K3 Mini have identical noise levels of 35db.
The Goldshell HS Box is 4.8% lighter than the other miner.
English
German
Hungarian
Dutch
Spanish
French
Italian
Czech
Polish
Greek