Compare Goldshell AL Box II Pro vs Goldshell Byte
Detailed comparison between Goldshell AL Box II Pro and Goldshell Byte. Compare hashrate, power consumption, profitability, and technical specifications.
Quick comparison: Goldshell AL Box II Pro vs Goldshell Byte. Daily profits: $-0.66 vs $-0.03.
Miner Comparison Results
Goldshell AL Box II Pro
Blake3 • September 2024
Goldshell Byte
zkSNARK • March 2025
Profitability Comparison
Daily Profit
Monthly Profit
Yearly Profit
Technical Specifications
Goldshell AL Box II Pro
Goldshell Byte
Profit Analysis
A detailed comparison of the daily, monthly, and yearly profitability between the two selected ASIC miners, highlighting which offers the better return on investment.
The Goldshell Byte delivers superior daily profit of $-0.03 versus $-0.66 from the Goldshell AL Box II Pro. With current electricity rates, the Goldshell Byte provides better return on investment through more efficient power consumption relative to its mining output. Power consumption analysis reveals the Goldshell AL Box II Pro requires 460W compared to 65W for the Goldshell Byte. This 395W difference translates to approximately $0.76 additional daily electricity costs, which significantly impacts long-term profitability especially during periods of lower mining rewards.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know
Which miner is more profitable: Goldshell AL Box II Pro or Goldshell Byte?
What is the hashrate of the Goldshell AL Box II Pro?
What is the hashrate of the Goldshell Byte?
Which cryptocurrencies are best to mine with Goldshell AL Box II Pro or Goldshell Byte?
What is the full-load power consumption of Goldshell AL Box II Pro or Goldshell Byte?
How efficient is Goldshell AL Box II Pro or Goldshell Byte in terms of hashrate per watt?
How does electricity cost affect the profitability of Goldshell AL Box II Pro or Goldshell Byte?
What is the estimated daily and monthly income from mining with Goldshell AL Box II Pro or Goldshell Byte?
What are the operational noise levels of Goldshell AL Box II Pro or Goldshell Byte?
What cooling solutions are recommended for Goldshell AL Box II Pro or Goldshell Byte?
Hardware Comparison
A side-by-side breakdown of key hardware specifications to evaluate performance, efficiency, and overall value of the two selected ASIC miners.
Release timeline shows the Goldshell AL Box II Pro launched in September 2024 while the Goldshell Byte entered the market in March 2025. Newer miners typically incorporate improved chip architecture and manufacturing processes, leading to better efficiency and performance characteristics. Physical dimensions comparison reveals the Goldshell AL Box II Pro measures 198 x 150 x 96mm while the Goldshell Byte has dimensions of 135 x 63 x 106mm. Size considerations directly impact rack density, shipping costs, and facility space requirements for mining operations. Weight specifications show the Goldshell AL Box II Pro at 3700g compared to 400g for the Goldshell Byte. Heavier units often indicate more robust construction and heat dissipation components but may require stronger mounting solutions and increase shipping expenses. Acoustic performance differs with the Goldshell AL Box II Pro operating at 35db versus 50db for the Goldshell Byte. Noise levels significantly impact placement options, with quieter units suitable for residential or office environments while louder miners require dedicated facilities with proper sound isolation. Humidity specifications indicate the Goldshell AL Box II Pro operates within 10 - 90 % conditions compared to 10 - 90 % for the Goldshell Byte. Better humidity tolerance enables deployment in more diverse geographic locations and reduces the need for expensive climate control systems in mining facilities.
Why Choose Our ASIC Miner Comparison Platform
Get the most accurate, transparent, and data-driven insights to choose the best mining hardware for your goals.
Real-Time Market Data
Our system pulls live pricing and profitability metrics to keep comparisons accurate and relevant.
Transparent Performance Metrics
Compare hashrate, efficiency, and ROI side-by-side without hidden data or biased rankings.
Clean & Intuitive Interface
Our comparison dashboard is designed for clarity — quickly find what matters most without the clutter.
Expert-Backed Analysis
Each comparison is verified by experienced mining professionals to help you make the most profitable choice.
Built for Miners, by Miners
Our mission is to simplify ASIC miner research with real data, transparent comparisons, and professional insights — helping you save time, reduce risk, and maximize profitability.
Compare ASIC Miners
Discover why our platform is the most reliable and transparent way to compare ASIC miners for maximum profitability.
Choosing our ASIC miner comparison platform gives you a clear advantage in navigating the complex and fast-changing world of crypto mining. We provide the most accurate, data-driven insights sourced directly from manufacturers and real-time market conditions, ensuring you always have access to up-to-date profitability, efficiency, and cost metrics. Our comparison tools let you easily evaluate hashrate, power consumption, ROI, and break-even periods, helping you identify which miner best fits your budget and long-term goals. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or an experienced investor managing a large-scale operation, our transparent and easy-to-use platform helps you make smarter, faster, and more profitable decisions.
Key Insights
Quick highlights comparing the performance and features of the selected ASIC miners.
The Goldshell Byte generates $0.64 more daily profit than the Goldshell AL Box II Pro.
The Goldshell AL Box II Pro generates $0.12 more daily income than the Goldshell Byte.
The Goldshell Byte consumes 85.9% less power, making it more energy efficient.
These miners use different algorithms (Scrypt vs SHA-256), so they mine different cryptocurrencies.
Both miners use Air cooling systems.
The Goldshell AL Box II Pro is quieter, with a noise level of 35db.
The Goldshell Byte is 89.2% lighter than the other miner.
English
German
Hungarian
Dutch
Spanish
French
Italian
Czech
Polish
Greek